Evidence-backed decision brief

Which AI research agent fits an academic literature review?

Compare Consensus, Elicit, Gemini Deep Research, and Scite Assistant across pricing, research capabilities, deployment, governance, data policy, integrations, and execution evidence.

Decision context · Researchers and evidence teams evaluating literature discovery and synthesis workflows
Candidate inclusion rule

Included when the product is a maintained research Agent with public first-party documentation for literature discovery or synthesis and the listed decision requirements. The current cohort is Consensus and Elicit and Gemini Deep Research and Scite Assistant; inclusion is not a ranking or claim that no other product qualifies.

Decision-Relevant Intelligence CoverageEvidence coverage75%

21 of 28 candidate-requirement cells have current Source-Backed or Execution-Verified answers.

7visible evidence gapsGaps remain unknown; they are not treated as product failures.
Decision requirements

What matters for this choice?

Adjusting these requirements is recorded only as an aggregate demand signal.

6 differing fields
Decision shortcut

Start with what can change the decision

This is a map of comparable evidence and unresolved questions, not a score, ranking, winner, or recommendation.

Shortlist ready · 75% covered

Evidence snapshot 2026-08-2121 source checksRefresh required

Start here

Pricing · Capabilities · Deployment · Enterprise controls · Privacy & data policy · Integrations

These are the selected requirements where at least two candidates have reliable, distinct answers. Use them to narrow the shortlist first.

Confirm before choosing

Deployment · Enterprise controls · Privacy & data policy

These fields contain the most unresolved candidate answers. Confirm them with the provider before purchase or deployment.

Consensus6/7 requirements supported6 of 7
Elicit6/7 requirements supported6 of 7
Gemini Deep Research6/7 requirements supported6 of 7
Scite Assistant3/7 requirements supported3 of 7
6

requirements with supported differences

  • Pricing4/4 candidates have reliable evidence across 4 documented answers.
  • Capabilities4/4 candidates have reliable evidence across 4 documented answers.
  • Deployment3/4 candidates have reliable evidence across 3 documented answers.
  • Enterprise controls3/4 candidates have reliable evidence across 3 documented answers.
  • Privacy & data policy3/4 candidates have reliable evidence across 3 documented answers.
  • Integrations4/4 candidates have reliable evidence across 4 documented answers.
3

intelligence gaps

  • Deployment1 candidate answer still unknown.
  • Enterprise controls1 candidate answer still unknown.
  • Privacy & data policy1 candidate answer still unknown.
4

execution evidence gaps

These remain unknown unless publication-approved governed execution evidence exists. Source documentation cannot close them.

Request evidence for these gaps →
Foundation Release

This comparison describes available evidence. “Unverified” means no matching accepted evidence—not that a feature is unavailable. It is not a universal ranking, score, recommendation, or purchasing decision.

Swipe horizontally to compare candidates. Candidate names remain visible while you review fields.

Agents
CConsensus

Consensus

Open profile →
EOught

Elicit

Open profile →
GDGoogle

Gemini Deep Research

Open profile →
SAScite

Scite Assistant

Open profile →
Pricing

Consensus publishes Free, Pro, Deep, Teams, and Enterprise plan options.

Source-Backed

Elicit publishes Basic, Plus, Pro, Scale, and custom Enterprise plans with different Research Agent, report, review, collaboration, export, and API allowances; purchasers should confirm the current billing interval and displayed regional price at checkout.

Source-Backed

Google publishes Google AI plan packaging for Gemini features. Prices, included limits, and availability vary by country and account; buyers should use the current regional checkout as the source of truth.

Source-Backed

Scite publishes individual and organization pricing paths with feature and usage differences. Buyers should verify the current displayed price and billing interval before purchase.

Source-Backed
Deployment

Consensus is provided as a hosted product and API service. Its official security documentation describes API query handling and organization-specific data controls but does not establish a self-hosted Consensus deployment.

Source-Backed

Elicit is offered as a hosted service across self-serve plans, while Enterprise lists custom deployment options such as single tenancy; availability and architecture of a custom deployment require a sales agreement.

Source-Backed

Gemini Deep Research is a hosted Gemini Apps capability that uses Google Search by default and can use connected Google services or uploaded sources. This does not establish a self-hosted deployment.

Source-Backed

Unknown / Insufficient Evidence

UnverifiedIntelligence Gap
Capabilities

Consensus searches scientific literature and generates source-linked synthesis with documented limitations.

Source-Backed

Elicit documents semantic paper and clinical-trial search, cited research reports, structured data extraction, and systematic-review workflows; generated claims are linked to sentence-level citations from underlying sources.

Source-Backed

Gemini Deep Research researches topics and produces reports linked to sources.

Source-Backed

Scite Assistant retrieves scientific literature, ranks sources, and generates cited responses with filtering, DOI scoping, structured output, and multi-turn support.

Source-Backed
Enterprise controls

Consensus documents organization plans with centralized billing and account management; Teams covers groups up to 200 seats, while Enterprise is quoted for organizations over 200 users and adds management for thousands of users.

Source-Backed

Elicit Enterprise lists SSO and SAML, two-factor authentication, user analytics, domain verification, custom deployments, and dedicated onboarding; Scale lists an admin panel with usage tracking and seat management.

Source-Backed

Google Workspace administrators can control access to Gemini features according to Workspace edition and service settings. The exact controls and data protections depend on the organization's license and configuration.

Source-Backed

Unknown / Insufficient Evidence

UnverifiedIntelligence Gap
Privacy & data policy

Consensus documents organization separation and states that customer content is not used for model training.

Source-Backed

Elicit's Privacy Policy describes the personal information it collects, how it uses and shares that information, retention practices, international transfers, and organizational and technical safeguards. Contract-specific and enterprise data-processing scope still requires procurement review.

Source-Backed

For consumer Gemini Apps, Google documents collection of prompts and shared content, possible human review, activity-dependent use to improve services and train models, and retention controls. Users should not submit confidential information they would not want reviewed; Workspace protections vary by license and are not inferred here.

Source-Backed

Unknown / Insufficient Evidence

UnverifiedIntelligence Gap
Integrations

Consensus lists library integrations for Enterprise organizations. Its Teams plan describes a Consensus Search API as coming soon, so API availability is not treated as generally available by this review.

Source-Backed

Elicit provides a bearer-token API for semantic search and automated report generation, with documented curl, Python, JavaScript, CLI, Slack bot, and Claude Code examples; API access requires Pro or above and is rate-limited by plan.

Source-Backed

Gemini Deep Research uses Google Search by default and can add uploaded files, NotebookLM notebooks, Gmail, and Drive as research sources; Gmail and Drive require the Google Workspace connected app, and availability varies by account and plan.

Source-Backed

Scite documents an OAuth-protected MCP service for ChatGPT, Claude, Gemini, Copilot, and other MCP-compatible clients, with full-text literature search and Smart Citation access. Account and content entitlements still apply.

Source-Backed
Decision boundary

What you can take away

This page is ready to support a shortlist. Agenova currently supports 21 of 28 selected cells with reliable evidence. Validate the remaining 7 gaps before purchase or deployment.

Take this comparison with you

Agenova Comparison Pack — $5

A reusable, source-backed artifact—not merely a file export. Every included fact keeps its evidence, source, verification state, and snapshot date.

Free on this pageInteractive comparison, evidence states, source links, and visible gaps.
$5 downloadable PackReusable structured comparison, evidence file, AI-ready context, and dated snapshot.
Select two candidates for your Pack

2 of 2 selected

Your selected candidates and originating decision stay attached to the comparison. No checkout starts from this link.
Help improve this decision

Did this comparison move your decision forward?

Anonymous feedback determines which evidence Agenova verifies next.

Shape the database

Couldn’t find what you need?

Request an Agent, correction, evidence field, or product improvement. Requests become development candidates only after real demand reaches a published threshold.