Evidence-backed decision brief

Which AI agent builder platform fits an enterprise team?

Compare CrewAI Enterprise, Dify, Amazon Bedrock Agents, and Salesforce Agentforce across pricing, builder capabilities, deployment, enterprise controls, data policy, integrations, and execution evidence.

Decision context · Platform, architecture, and automation leaders evaluating governed Agent development
Candidate inclusion rule

Included when the product is a maintained workflow Agent with public first-party documentation for cross-application automation and the listed decision requirements. The current cohort is CrewAI Enterprise and Dify and Amazon Bedrock Agents and Salesforce Agentforce; inclusion is not a ranking or claim that no other product qualifies.

Decision-Relevant Intelligence CoverageEvidence coverage86%

24 of 28 candidate-requirement cells have current Source-Backed or Execution-Verified answers.

4visible evidence gapsGaps remain unknown; they are not treated as product failures.
Decision requirements

What matters for this choice?

Adjusting these requirements is recorded only as an aggregate demand signal.

6 differing fields
Decision shortcut

Start with what can change the decision

This is a map of comparable evidence and unresolved questions, not a score, ranking, winner, or recommendation.

Shortlist ready · 86% covered

Evidence snapshot 2026-08-2124 source checksRefresh required

Start here

Pricing · Capabilities · Deployment · Enterprise controls · Privacy & data policy · Integrations

These are the selected requirements where at least two candidates have reliable, distinct answers. Use them to narrow the shortlist first.

Confirm before choosing

No non-execution intelligence gaps

The remaining uncertainty is limited to governed execution evidence.

CrewAI Enterprise6/7 requirements supported6 of 7
Dify6/7 requirements supported6 of 7
Amazon Bedrock Agents6/7 requirements supported6 of 7
Salesforce Agentforce6/7 requirements supported6 of 7
6

requirements with supported differences

  • Pricing4/4 candidates have reliable evidence across 4 documented answers.
  • Capabilities4/4 candidates have reliable evidence across 4 documented answers.
  • Deployment4/4 candidates have reliable evidence across 4 documented answers.
  • Enterprise controls4/4 candidates have reliable evidence across 4 documented answers.
  • Privacy & data policy4/4 candidates have reliable evidence across 4 documented answers.
  • Integrations4/4 candidates have reliable evidence across 4 documented answers.
0

intelligence gaps

All selected non-execution requirements have reliable answers.

4

execution evidence gaps

These remain unknown unless publication-approved governed execution evidence exists. Source documentation cannot close them.

Request evidence for these gaps →
Foundation Release

This comparison describes available evidence. “Unverified” means no matching accepted evidence—not that a feature is unavailable. It is not a universal ranking, score, recommendation, or purchasing decision.

Swipe horizontally to compare candidates. Candidate names remain visible while you review fields.

Agents
CECrewAI

CrewAI Enterprise

Open profile →
DLangGenius

Dify

Open profile →
ABAmazon Web Services

Amazon Bedrock Agents

Open profile →
SASalesforce

Salesforce Agentforce

Open profile →
Pricing

CrewAI publishes a free Basic plan with 50 workflow executions per month and a custom-priced Enterprise plan.

Source-Backed

Dify publishes free Sandbox and Community options, paid Cloud workspace plans, and custom-priced Enterprise self-hosting.

Source-Backed

Amazon publishes Bedrock usage pricing and related model and service charges.

Source-Backed

Salesforce publishes Agentforce packages and usage pricing.

Source-Backed
Deployment

CrewAI documents deployment on CrewAI Cloud, a customer VPC, or customer infrastructure, depending on plan.

Source-Backed

Dify documents managed Cloud, free self-hosted Community, and Enterprise private-infrastructure deployment options.

Source-Backed

Amazon Bedrock Agents is now named Amazon Bedrock Agents Classic and is not open to new customers; existing customers can continue using it, while AWS directs new customers toward Amazon Bedrock AgentCore. Existing deployments use version aliases and application API calls.

Source-Backed

Agentforce agents are built and activated in eligible Salesforce organizations and can be deployed through configured connections to Salesforce experiences, mobile, Slack, messaging, and other supported channels. Editions and add-on licenses vary by agent type.

Source-Backed
Capabilities

CrewAI provides agent, crew, and flow primitives for multi-agent orchestration.

Source-Backed

Dify provides documented tools for building agent applications with knowledge and tools.

Source-Backed

Bedrock Agents combine models, action groups, knowledge bases, and orchestration instructions.

Source-Backed

Agentforce provides documented agent building, actions, orchestration, and Salesforce data grounding.

Source-Backed
Enterprise controls

CrewAI documents Enterprise team management for inviting teammates, configuring role-based access control, and controlling access to production automations.

Source-Backed

Dify Enterprise documents multi-tenant isolation with tenant-level quotas, billing, and access policies, plus deployment inside a customer VPC or air-gapped environment and bring-your-own-key encryption. Exact identity, audit, and license controls still require confirmation for the selected edition.

Source-Backed

Amazon Bedrock Agents supports IAM service roles and scoped permissions for models, knowledge bases, guardrails, S3, and Lambda action groups.

Source-Backed

Agentforce respects Salesforce licenses, permission sets, field-level security, and sharing settings; access to standard and custom actions additionally depends on the referenced Salesforce products, classes, flows, templates, and configured permissions.

Source-Backed
Privacy & data policy

CrewAI's current platform terms grant CrewAI a limited license to use Customer Data to provide the platform, improve and develop products and services—including training or developing models or algorithms—and create aggregated or anonymized data. Buyers should reconcile this contractual language with any negotiated enterprise data terms before using sensitive workloads.

Source-Backed

Dify states that it does not use AI interaction data for model training. With customer-supplied model keys, data goes to the selected provider under that provider's terms; with Dify-managed providers, subprocessors are contractually prohibited from training on the data. Retention continues only as needed for service, security, legal, and recordkeeping purposes before deletion or anonymization.

Source-Backed

AWS documents default encryption of Bedrock agent control-plane and session data with AWS-owned keys, with an option to use customer-managed symmetric KMS keys; KMS usage and customer configuration remain subject to AWS shared-responsibility and pricing terms.

Source-Backed

Salesforce documents Agentforce integration with the Einstein Trust Layer, including a zero-data-retention policy for third-party LLMs and controls intended to keep customer data from being used to train third-party models; organization-specific processing terms still require procurement review.

Source-Backed
Integrations

CrewAI documents Enterprise triggers and flows for Gmail, Drive, Outlook, Teams, OneDrive, HubSpot, Slack, and Salesforce, plus integration tooling for existing CrewAI automations and Amazon Bedrock Agents.

Source-Backed

Dify documents data-source plugin types for web crawlers, online documents, and online drives, with examples including Notion, Confluence, GitHub, OneDrive, Google Drive, Box, AWS S3, and Tencent COS; individual connectors require their own authentication and configuration.

Source-Backed

Amazon Bedrock Agents Classic orchestrates foundation models, action-group APIs, knowledge bases, organizational data sources, applications, and user conversations; it is available only to existing customers under the documented maintenance-mode boundary.

Source-Backed

MuleSoft connects Agentforce with third-party systems through documented APIs and connectors.

Source-Backed
Decision boundary

What you can take away

This page is ready to support a shortlist. Agenova currently supports 24 of 28 selected cells with reliable evidence. Validate the remaining 4 gaps before purchase or deployment.

Take this comparison with you

Agenova Comparison Pack — $5

A reusable, source-backed artifact—not merely a file export. Every included fact keeps its evidence, source, verification state, and snapshot date.

Free on this pageInteractive comparison, evidence states, source links, and visible gaps.
$5 downloadable PackReusable structured comparison, evidence file, AI-ready context, and dated snapshot.
Select two candidates for your Pack

2 of 2 selected

Your selected candidates and originating decision stay attached to the comparison. No checkout starts from this link.
Help improve this decision

Did this comparison move your decision forward?

Anonymous feedback determines which evidence Agenova verifies next.

Shape the database

Couldn’t find what you need?

Request an Agent, correction, evidence field, or product improvement. Requests become development candidates only after real demand reaches a published threshold.